Midazolam Sedation during Spinal Anesthesia: Optimal Dosage

Optimal dose of midazolam for sedation during spinal anesthesia was investigated. One hundred and fifteen patients for spinal anesthesia (analgesic area below Th4), 30 to 70 years old, were divided into five groups according to midazolam dose: 0.025mg/kg (27 cases), 0.05mg/kg (25 cases), 0.075mg/kg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNihon Rinshō Masui Gakkai shi Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 257 - 262
Main Authors NISHIYAMA, Tomoki, HIRASAKI, Akihito, ODAKA, Yasuo, SETO, Kozo, IWASAKI, Tatsuo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA 1994
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0285-4945
1349-9149
DOI10.2199/jjsca.14.257

Cover

More Information
Summary:Optimal dose of midazolam for sedation during spinal anesthesia was investigated. One hundred and fifteen patients for spinal anesthesia (analgesic area below Th4), 30 to 70 years old, were divided into five groups according to midazolam dose: 0.025mg/kg (27 cases), 0.05mg/kg (25 cases), 0.075mg/kg (23 cases), 0.1mg/kg (25 cases), and 0.125mg/kg (15 cases). Responses to verbal command and ciliary reflex were signifi-cantly more depressed in the 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, and 0.125mg/kg groups than in the 0.025mg/kg group. The sedative effect of 0.025mg/kg of midazolam was therefore considered to be weak. In more than 25% of cases in the 0.075, 0.1, and 0.125mg/kg groups, respiration was depressed by dropped tongue. Respiratory rate increased significantly in the 0.1 and 0.125mg/kg groups. The numbers of cases who required vasopressor, who had body motion or nausea and vomiting did not differ much among the five groups. Blood pressure was more stable in the 0.025 and 0.05mg/kg groups than in the other three groups. The stabilities of circulation and respiration were better in the 0.025 and 0.05mg/kg groups than in the others. It was concluded that the optimal dose of midazolam for sedation during spinal anesthesia in patients aged 30-70 years is 0.05mg/kg.
ISSN:0285-4945
1349-9149
DOI:10.2199/jjsca.14.257