Complications of Fluoroscopically Guided Extraforaminal Cervical Nerve Blocks: An Analysis of 1036 Injections

• Published in: Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume Vol. 87; no. 5; pp. 1025 - 1030
• Main Authors: Ma, Daniel J, Gilula, Louis A, Riew, K Daniel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated 01.05.2005
• ISSN: 0021-9355; 1535-1386
• DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02139

BackgroundA number of serious complications associated with fluoroscopically guided extraforaminal cervical nerve blocks have been reported in the literature. The purpose of the present study was to determine the rate of complications associated with these blocks and to determine whether needle positioning during the procedure affected the prevalence of complications at one institution.MethodsBetween October 1999 and June 2003, we performed 1036 fluoroscopically guided extraforaminal cervical nerve blocks in 844 patients. Plain radiographs documenting the procedure were made as part of the standard quality-assurance protocol. An independent observer who was uninvolved with the procedures reviewed a prospectively kept database on all patients. We subsequently reviewed the patient records to identify complications.ResultsThere were no catastrophic complications such as vessel damage, paralysis, or death. Overall, fourteen patients (1.66%) had a minor complication in association with the procedure. With the numbers available, the rate of complications associated with pdeep injection (798 blocks) was not significantly different from that associated with shallow injection (238 blocks) (1.89% compared with 0.84%). However, the rate of complications associated with anterior placement of the needle tip (thirty-three blocks) was higher than that associated with ideal placement of the needle tip (904 blocks) (6.06% compared with 1.55%) (p = 0.04).ConclusionsNo catastrophic complications occurred in this series of 1036 nerve blocks. We found that the medial-lateral needle depth as seen on frontal-view radiographs was not associated with complications, although the anterior positioning of the needle as seen on lateral-view radiographs was associated with minor complications. Our results suggest that, with our technique, cervical nerve blocks are relatively safe procedures.Level of EvidenceTherapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.