Detection of anti-mitochondrial 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase complex subunit's antibodies for the diagnosis of Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA), directed against the E2 subunits of the 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complexes, are markers of Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC), a chronic autoimmune liver disease. However, it has not been stablished the clinical significance of subunits-specific AMA type PDC-E2 su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) Vol. 268; p. 108749
Main Authors Poyatos, Elisabet, Morandeira, Francisco, Climent, Joan, Mas, Virginia, Castellote, José, Bas, Jordi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA), directed against the E2 subunits of the 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complexes, are markers of Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC), a chronic autoimmune liver disease. However, it has not been stablished the clinical significance of subunits-specific AMA type PDC-E2 subunit of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex-, BCOADC-E2 subunit of the branched-chain 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complex-, OGDC-E2 subunit of the 2-oxo-glutarate dehydrogenase complex- and nPDC -native pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (M2-AMA), and not all AMA specificities are associated with PBC. The aim of the present study was to show the usefulness of the number and combination of subunits-specific AMA positive for the diagnosis of PBC. We detected AMA by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF-AMA) and M2-AMA by dot-blot. We studied the relationship of AMA with some clinical and laboratory variables in 307 patients (37% PBC) with positive dot-blot for M2-AMA. In PBC patients, we detected different E2 subunits of the 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complexes antibodies (M2-AMA): 82.9% were specific for nPDC, 64.5% for PDC-E2, 44.4% for BCOADC-E2, and 9.6% for OGDC-E2. IIF and dot-blot tests achieved an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC AUC) of 0.674 (1:320 cut-off titer, Sensibility (Se) 64.7%, Specificity (Sp) 63.4%) and 0.663 (three specificities M2-AMA, Se 43%, Sp 81.2%), respectively. The detection of different E2 subunits of the 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complexes antibodies (M2-AMA) by dot-blot showed different ROC AUC: anti-PDC-E2 showed an AUC of 0.610, a Se of 43.7%, and a Sp of 76.4%. Finally, the combined detection of nPDC/BCOADC-E2/PDC-E2 reached an AUC of 0.6095, a Se of 59.6%, and a Sp of 70.2%.The identification of two M2-AMA specificities through dot-blot increased PBC odds ratio (OR) by 2.05 (p:0.031), as compared to the identification of one specificity. Moreover, the identification of three and four specificities increased OR by 4.63 (p:0.000) and by 21.53 (p:0.006), respectively. nPDC/OGDC-E2/PDC-E2 and nPDC/OGDC-E2/BCOADC-E2/PDC-E2 combinations increased PBC OR by 10.04 (p:0.034), as compared to any other combination. 1:320 and 1:640 IIF-AMA increased PBC OR by 4.93 (p:0.009) and 7.67 (p:0.001), respectively, as compared to IIF-AMA titers equal to or less than 1:160. M2-AMA dot-blot was less sensitive but more specific than IIF-AMA, with similar predictive capacity for PBC. Increased numbers of M2-AMA specificities clearly increased the risk of PBC. Some combinations were strongly related to PBC (nPDC/BCOADC-E2/PDC-E2), but others were not (one single M2-AMA, and nPDC plus PDC-E2). M2-AMA dot-blot was less sensitive but more specific than IIF-AMA, with similar predictive capacity for PBC. Increased numbers of M2-AMA specificities clearly increased the risk of PBC, being some combinations, such as nPDC/BCOADC-E2/PDC-E2, more related to PBC than others. Finally, the determination of the number of M2-AMA specificities was more useful than the particular subunit target for PBC diagnosis. In conclusion, the study of the number of M2-AMA specificities by dot-blot should definitely be considered for PBC diagnosis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1521-6616
1521-7035
DOI:10.1016/j.clim.2021.108749