Tuning transport properties in carbyne-DNA fragments-carbyne devices

[Display omitted] •A-T/G-C bases with nucleoside and nucleotide weakly coupled to polyyne electrodes are investigated.•HOMO locate at A and G while LUMO locate at T and C without electrodes.•HOMO locate at bases pairs while LUMO locate at the electrodes.•A-T/G-C devices without nucleoside and nucleo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaterials letters Vol. 336; p. 133925
Main Authors Mota, Elder Augusto Viana, Paula, Marcos Vinícius da Silva, da Silva Jr, Carlos Alberto Brito, Del Nero, Jordan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.04.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •A-T/G-C bases with nucleoside and nucleotide weakly coupled to polyyne electrodes are investigated.•HOMO locate at A and G while LUMO locate at T and C without electrodes.•HOMO locate at bases pairs while LUMO locate at the electrodes.•A-T/G-C devices without nucleoside and nucleotide have tunneling current 1,000 times greater.•Six devices behave like Zenner diode and RTD for tuning the transport properties. Here, we investigated the tuning transport properties from six nanodevices based on molecular tunnel junctions from DNA fragments and carbyne electrodes via DFT/NEGF. Our results show that for DNA fragments HOMOs and LUMOs locate at the purine (A and G) and pyrimidine (T and C) bases, respectively. This is an important factor to develop nanodevices. So, the influence of carbyne electrodes shows that molecular projected self-consistent hamiltonian (MPSH) states for HOMO (LUMO) locate DNA fragments (carbyne electrodes) presenting Zener diode and resonant tunnel diode (RTD) behavior as a current sensor for forward bias. A-G and T-C nanodevices operate at nA whereas A-G and T-C nucleoside or nucleotide at μA. Our discoveries make themhighly promising in nanoelectronics and nanobiosensors applications for tuning the transport properties.
ISSN:0167-577X
1873-4979
DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2023.133925