Color and surface stainability of additively and subtractively manufactured interim restorative materials against mouth rinses

• Published in: The Journal of prosthetic dentistry Vol. 130; no. 6; pp. 927 - 934
• Main Authors: Myagmar, Gerelmaa, Daher, René, Yeo, In-Sung Luke, Ahn, Jin-Soo, Han, Jung-Suk, Lee, Jae-Hyun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.12.2023
• ISSN: 0022-3913; 1097-6841
• DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.003

STATEMENT OF PROBLEMInterim restorations are often used along with mouth rinses during the healing period following surgical procedures. However, evidence regarding the color and surface properties of digitally fabricated interim restorations after oral rinsing is lacking.PURPOSEThe purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate whether different mouth rinses could affect the color and surface roughness of milled and printed interim restorations after simulated oral rinsing.MATERIAL AND METHODSDisk-shaped specimens (Ø15×2 mm; N=180) were fabricated by using conventional (Jet Tooth Shade), milled (Yamahachi PMMA Disk), and printed (NextDent C&B) resin materials. All resin specimens were divided into 3 different groups according to the rinsing material: distilled water, whitening mouth rinse (Listerine Healthy White), and conventional mouth rinse (Listerine Cool Mint). The specimens were further allocated into short- and long-term subgroups, and oral rinsing simulation was performed (n=10). Short-term rinsing simulated the conditions in a usual interim restoration period, and long-term rinsing was performed to evaluate the properties of the interim materials. The color differences (CIEDE2000, ΔE00) between the baseline and each time point were determined by using a spectrophotometer. The surface roughness of the tested specimens was measured by using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests with nonparametric pairwise comparisons were used to analyze the data (α=.05).RESULTSOn simulation of a 6-month use of the mouth rinse, the color change in the milled resin did not differ from that in the conventional resin (P>.334), but the printed resin showed a significantly greater color change than the other resins (P<.007). The greatest color change with the printed resin was observed when a conventional mouth rinse was used. However, all color changes were below a perceptible threshold of 1.30. When daily rinsing for 14 years was simulated, all resin groups showed a perceptible color change when conventional mouth rinse was used, and the printed resin showed the greatest median ±interquartile range ΔE00 (2.24 ±0.2). In both short- and long-term simulations, the printed resin rinsed with the conventional mouth rinse showed significantly greater roughness than that rinsed with distilled water (P<.009).CONCLUSIONSThe printed resin showed higher stainability than the conventional resin, and the color change was greatest with the conventional mouth rinse. However, in 6 months of daily mouth rinse simulation, all the tested resin materials exhibited imperceptible color change and clinically acceptable surface roughness.