Stigma and contact with mental illness in a university population through volunteering: a case-control study

Introduction Stigma in mental illness has a negative impact on the daily functioning of the patient, their personal development and their clinical prognosis. Direct contact with people who suffer from this pathology could modify the stigma towards these populations. Objectives The objective of the s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean psychiatry Vol. 66; no. S1; p. S242
Main Authors Madoz-Gúrpide, A., Ochoa Mangado, E., Cuadrado del Rey, P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Paris Cambridge University Press 01.03.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction Stigma in mental illness has a negative impact on the daily functioning of the patient, their personal development and their clinical prognosis. Direct contact with people who suffer from this pathology could modify the stigma towards these populations. Objectives The objective of the study is to assess whether the stigma of mental illness in university students is modified by contact with people suffering from mental illness, established through volunteering activities with that population. Methods Observational case-control study. The sample is made up of young subjects (18 to 35 years old) who have studied or are studying a university degree during the 2021-2022 academic year. The cases (n=91) are subjects who have ever volunteered with people diagnosed with mental illness. Those who have not had this experience constitute the control group (n=237). The variables were collected by completing an anonymous online questionnaire. To analyze stigma, the Attribution Questionnaire-27 questionnaire was used, which offers a total score as well as 9 domains related to stigma. Statistical analysis (including multiple linear regression) was performed with the statistical package IBM SPSS Statistics, version 20. Results Once adjusted for age and gender, the case group scores lower, with statistically significant differences, in the subscales Anger (p-value: 0.001), Dangerousness (p-value: 0.000), Fear (p-value: 0.000 ), Coercion (p-value: 0.028), Segregation (p-value: 0.000), Avoidance (p-value: 0.000), as well as in the Total Score (p-value: 0.000). Likewise, it is also observed that the group of cases score higher on the Help subscale (p-value: 0.002). Coefficients Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t Sig. 95% Confidence Interval for B B Std. Error Beta Lower limit Upper Limit (Constant) 72,745 10,931 6,655 ,000 51,234 94,256 Volunteering 13,100 3,196 ,236 4,098 ,000 6,810 19,391 Age ,669 ,342 ,113 1,956 ,051 -,004 1,342 Gender -,196 2,941 -,004 -,067 ,947 -5,983 5,591 a. Dependent Variable: Total Score Conclusions Previous contact with patients with mental illness through voluntary activities seems to favor less stigma towards mental pathology. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
ISSN:0924-9338
1778-3585
DOI:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.557