COVID-19 mental health helpline: A tool for a rural population

• Published in: European psychiatry Vol. 64; no. S1; p. S285
• Main Authors: Jesus, B., Ramos, S. Freitas, Vaz Soares, M.I. Fonseca Marinho, Correia, J. Martins, Cruz E Sousa, D., Caetano, S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Paris Cambridge University Press 01.04.2021
• Subjects: Abstract; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; E-Poster Presentation; Helpline; Mental health; Telemedicine
• ISSN: 0924-9338; 1778-3585
• DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.764

Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a negative impact for mental health. ULS-Guarda in cooperation with Portugal National Health Service, provided the population of the district of Guarda with a mental health helpline (MHHL). Objectives Provide a descriptive data analysis of the MHHL calls received between April 1 st  and September 20 th  of 2020. Methods The data was obtained through the filling out of questionnaires. It included fields for gender, age, the type of service provided, relation to COVID-19, symptoms displayed and the number calls made per patient. For the statistical analysis, Microsoft Excel  TM  was utilized. Results MHHL received 191 calls. The largest volume was received during April, which saw 116 instances of patients seeking the MHHL. The number of calls then tapered progressively throughout the following months. The services provided were split between psychiatric assistance, psychologic assistance, and the renovation of medical prescriptions, in 44%, 31% and 19% of the cases, respectively. The 101 patients who resorted to the MHHL were unevenly distributed in gender, being 74 female and 27 male individuals. Their ages were mostly between 50 and 69 years old. The most common symptoms were anxiety, depressed humor and insomnia, in 35%, 16% and 11% of the cases, respectively. Conclusions The largest influx of calls coincides with the home confinement period, and decreased alongside the relaxation of the confinement measures held. The MHHL had enough adherence to warrant consideration of it being an alternative means of healthcare access, especially in situations where physical access to healthcare is restricted.