Implementation of environmental tax in Sub-Saharan Africa: a comparative analysis from policy adopter and policy pioneers

Motivated by the pressing need to address environmental concerns, this paper undertakes a comparative analysis of environmental taxes in Ghana (policy adopter) and South Africa and Mauritius (policy pioneers). Results indicate that environmental taxes are major policy tools implemented in Ghana, Sou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMitigation and adaptation strategies for global change Vol. 30; no. 2; p. 11
Main Authors Gamette, Pius, Oteng, Clement
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.02.2025
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Motivated by the pressing need to address environmental concerns, this paper undertakes a comparative analysis of environmental taxes in Ghana (policy adopter) and South Africa and Mauritius (policy pioneers). Results indicate that environmental taxes are major policy tools implemented in Ghana, South Africa and Mauritius to curb environmental degradation. Comparatively, environmental tax rates in Ghana are lower than those in South Africa and Mauritius. Polluters in Ghana pay three major tax burdens (tax rate for plastics, fuel, and diesel) as compared to four tax burdens (plastic container levy, MID levy on fossil fuels, vehicle ownership taxes, and environment protection fees) in Mauritius and six tax burdens (plastic bags, electricity generation, vehicle carbon emissions, carbon emissions from industrial processes, fuel and tyres) in South Africa. Environmental taxes in these three countries inherently adopt multi-dimensional approaches (internalisation of externalities, adherence to the polluter pays principle and generation of domestic revenues) towards broad economic objectives. As a contribution, this study provides pertinent information to African countries that are yet to adopt environmental taxes as a novel strategy to expand their fiscal space and curb environmental degradation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1381-2386
1573-1596
DOI:10.1007/s11027-025-10202-3