Self-views of disadvantage and success impact perceptions of privilege among White men

•Explores drivers of White men’s perceptions of workplace White privilege.•Draws on theories of multiple social categorization and self-image threat.•Finds White men with experience of disadvantage more likely to perceive privilege.•Finds mixed evidence for success at work as a moderator of effect o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOrganizational behavior and human decision processes Vol. 169; p. 104114
Main Authors Fath, Sean, Ma, Anyi, Shelby Rosette, Ashleigh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Explores drivers of White men’s perceptions of workplace White privilege.•Draws on theories of multiple social categorization and self-image threat.•Finds White men with experience of disadvantage more likely to perceive privilege.•Finds mixed evidence for success at work as a moderator of effect of disadvantage. When presented with evidence of their advantages, the privileged often either deny that their social system has accorded them any gains or that social inequity exists altogether. In this research, we draw on two literatures related to self-perception—multiple social categorization and self-image threat—to propose factors that may increase the racial privilege perceptions of White men, a group often in positions of power in the workplace. Across ten studies (N = 5,124) in a workplace context, we find that White men who self-report (Studies 1c, 2a-d, 3) or recall (Studies 1a-b, 4) experience(s) of disadvantage based on a social category (e.g., physical disability) perceive greater White privilege than those without exposure to such disadvantage. Additionally, we find mixed evidence that greater self-reported success at work corresponds to increased perceptions of privilege for White men who have experienced social category-based disadvantage. We discuss these findings, their implications, and future directions.
ISSN:0749-5978
1095-9920
DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.104114