Political message matching and green behaviors: Strengths and boundary conditions for promoting high-impact behavioral change

Matching messages to characteristics of individuals is a frequently used technique in persuasion research. However, these interventions rarely target high-impact, difficult sustainability behaviors. In four studies, we present participants with persuasive messages consistent (or inconsistent) with t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of environmental psychology Vol. 76; p. 101643
Main Authors Scharmer, Alexandra, Snyder, Mark
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Matching messages to characteristics of individuals is a frequently used technique in persuasion research. However, these interventions rarely target high-impact, difficult sustainability behaviors. In four studies, we present participants with persuasive messages consistent (or inconsistent) with their political beliefs; these messages advocate for a variety of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors (e.g., voting, diet). Generally, we find that messages consistent with an individual's political orientation elicit more pro-environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions, but these matching effects are limited only to the attitudinal and behavioral domains specifically mentioned in the message (i.e. there is no spillover into other attitudinal or behavioral domains). Practical implications and future directions are discussed. •Matching an environmental message to readers' politics can be useful, with limits.•Matching is most effective for broad attitudes, least effective for political acts.•Little evidence for attitudinal or behavioral spillover between domains.•Future interventions should specifically address attitudes/behaviors of interest.
ISSN:0272-4944
1522-9610
DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101643