Challenging institutions: Getting goods or getting your own institution?

I present a discussion of the current state of liberal internationalism as it relates to international organisations. I maintain that the literature focuses too much on liberal internationalism instead of non-liberal internationalism. This is problematic because non-liberal states are increasingly b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of regional security Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. 111 - 122
Main Author Millard, Matt
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published University of Belgrade - Faculty of Political Sciences and Belgrade Centre for Security Policy 2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:I present a discussion of the current state of liberal internationalism as it relates to international organisations. I maintain that the literature focuses too much on liberal internationalism instead of non-liberal internationalism. This is problematic because non-liberal states are increasingly becoming important players in the international system, as is the case with Russia and China. I argue that non-liberal states have a variety of approaches in their dealings with international institutions that can enable them to maximise their net gains from institutions. These are: 1) keep using the liberal institution, 2) utilise institutional ala cartism (forum shopping), 3) create an anti-liberal institution, or 4) opt out of institutions altogether. Scholars and practitioners alike should acknowledge that international institutions can be a vehicle whereby non-liberal states maximise their power and diminish the power and influence of liberal states.
ISSN:2217-995X
2406-0364
DOI:10.11643/issn.2217-995X162SPM71