Comparison and Influence of a Multicomponent Educational Program on the Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Group of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

• Published in: Journal of clinical rheumatology Vol. 30; no. 5; p. 200
• Main Authors: Santos-Moreno, Pedro, Rodríguez-Vargas, Gabriel-Santiago, Rodríguez-Florido, Fernando, Rubio-Rubio, Jaime-Andrés, Rodríguez, Pedro A, Rojas-Villarraga, Adriana
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.08.2024
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - diagnosis; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy; Female; Health Literacy - methods; Health Literacy - statistics & numerical data; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Education as Topic - methods; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index
• ISSN: 1536-7355
• DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000002105

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease that affects different areas of the patient's body. Patient education and health literacy is essential for them to participate actively in follow-up. The aim of this study was to assess differences between clinimetric measurements done by a medical team and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in RA and understand the impact of patient education strategies in order to identify differences between RA assessment methods. This is a longitudinal cohort study. It included adult patients with RA and access to digital tools. These were divided into 3 groups by type of education. Group 1 included patients who participated in a multicomponent RA educational program. Group 2 did not have this multicomponent RA education. Group 3 did not receive any education. The 3 groups performed PROMs. Disease activity scales, functional class, and quality of life were measured. Univariate and bivariate analysis (χ 2 and Wilcoxon for paired data) were done. Twenty-eight patients were included in group 1, 26 in group 2, and 37 in group 3. All were women. In group 1, there were no significant differences in clinimetrics between the medical team and patient's PROMs except for fatigue. In group 2 and group 3, significant differences were found. The RAPID3 and PAS variables did not show significant differences when analyzed by intervention subgroups. This study shows no differences between clinimetrics/PROMs for patients with a high-level education on RA and physicians. On the other hand, when patient did not have any RA education, the clinimetric results differed from physician measurement.