Foraging Habitat and Echolocation Behaviour of Schneider's Leafnosed Bat, Hipposideros speoris, in a Vegetation Mosaic in Sri Lanka

• Published in: Behavioral ecology and sociobiology Vol. 50; no. 3; pp. 209 - 218
• Main Authors: Pavey, Chris R., Grunwald, Jan-Eric, Neuweiler, Gerhard
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.08.2001; Berlin Springer
• Subjects: Aerial locomotion; Animal ethology; Bats; Biological and medical sciences; Foraging; Forest canopy; Forest habitats; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Habitats; Hipposideros speoris; Horseshoes; Mammalia; Mosaic; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Sri Lanka; Vegetation; Vertebrata; Wildlife habitats; Asia; Sri Lanka; Vertebrata; Feeding behavior; Mammalia; Home range; Animal plant relation; Interspecific comparison; Habitat; Foraging behavior; Clutter; Chiroptera; Echolocation; Field study
• ISSN: 0340-5443; 1432-0762
• DOI: 10.1007/s002650100363

The Hipposideridae and Rhinolophidae are closely related families of bats that have similar echolocation (long-duration pure-tone signal, high duty cycle) and auditory systems (Doppler-shift compensation, auditory fovea). Rhinolophid bats are known to forage in highly cluttered areas where they capture fluttering insects, whereas the foraging habitat of hipposiderid bats is not well understood. Compared to rhinolophids, hipposiderid calls are shorter in duration, have lower duty cycles, and they exhibit only partial Doppler-shift compensation. These differences suggest that the foraging habit of the two families may also differ. We tested this hypothesis by studying foraging and echolocation of Hipposideros speoris at a site with a range of vegetation types. Bats foraged only while in flight and used all available closed and edge habitats, including areas adjacent to open space. Levels of clutter were high in forest and moderate in other foraging areas. Prey capture (n=42) occurred in edge vegetation where it bordered open space. Echolocation signals of H. speoris lacked an initial upward frequency-modulated sweep and were of moderate duration (5.1-8.7 ms). Sequences had high duty cycles (23-41%) and very high pulse repetition rates (22.8-60.6 Hz). Variation in signal parameters during search phase flight across foraging habitats was low. H. speoris showed a greater flexibility in its use of foraging habitat than is known for any rhinolophid species. Our study confirmed that there are differences in habitat use between hipposiderid and rhinolophid bats and we suggest that this divergence is a consequence of differences in their echolocation and auditory systems.