A Cross-Case Analysis of the Use of Web-Based ePortfolios in Higher Education

• Published in: Journal of Information Technology Education. Innovations in Practice Vol. 12; pp. 253 - 286
• Main Authors: McWhorter, Rochell R, Delello, Julie A, Roberts, Paul B, Raisor, Cindy M, Fowler, Debra A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Santa Rosa Informing Science Institute 2013
• Subjects: Barriers; Career Planning; Case Studies; Chemical Engineering; Electronic Publishing; Engineering Education; Graduate Students; Internet; Labor Force Development; Learning Experience; Mixed Methods Research; Portfolios (Background Materials); Preservice Teacher Education; Socialization; Student Attitudes; Technology Education; Undergraduate Students; United States (Southwest); Visual Learning
• ISSN: 2165-3151; 2165-316X
• DOI: 10.28945/1900

Higher education is mandated to document student learning outcomes and ePortfolios have been offered as a panacea for assessment, evaluation, and accreditation. However, the student voice regarding the value students construct from building and utilizing web-based electronic portfolios (ePortfolios) in higher education has been sparse or non-existent in a number of disciplines. In the current study, a total of 459 undergraduate and graduate students' perceptions were collected through structured surveys, reflective journals, emails, and reflection papers. This mixed methods study reviews the historical foundations of contemporary web-based ePortfolios within a constructivist theoretical frame and presents four case studies from two universities in southwest USA from four disciplines (education, industrial technology, chemical engineering, and human resource development). A compilation of research findings from the four case studies yielded 27 categories that were later condensed through cross-case analysis resulting in five emerging themes: "career-focused, big picture of learning, social and visual learning, enablers of ePortfolios, and barriers of ePortfolios." Each theme is discussed and illuminated by extracts of student work and supported by relevant literature. Recommendations include greater communication with students regarding expectations and requirements of the ePortfolio, providing student and faculty training on web-based ePortfolios, and forming a community of practice.