A Compendium of Common Heuristics, Misconceptions, and Biased Reasoning used in Statistical Thinking

Over the past decades, many researchers have identified ways of reasoning in the domain of statistics and probabilities that do not match statistics and probabilities results. Some of these inadequate conceptualizations are reviewed herein. They include, among others, the gambler’s fallacy, the law...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTutorials in quantitative methods for psychology Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 57 - 75
Main Authors Husereau, Tracy, Cousineau, Denis, Zang, Shuo, Gibeau, Rose-Marie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Université d'Ottawa 01.03.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Over the past decades, many researchers have identified ways of reasoning in the domain of statistics and probabilities that do not match statistics and probabilities results. Some of these inadequate conceptualizations are reviewed herein. They include, among others, the gambler’s fallacy, the law of small numbers, the misunderstanding of randomness, and they touch various aspects of statistics reasoning (sampling procedures, probability estimation, mean estimation, variance estimation, and inference). A classification is put forward.
ISSN:1913-4126
DOI:10.20982/tqmp.20.1.p057