Axiological Dimension of the Modern Science Communication

The article is devoted to the analysis of the specifics of the values of contemporary science communication. The values of science are still underestimated by many science researchers, in particular, sociologists. At the same time, the clear definition of the key values of science and intersubjectiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhilosophy and cosmology : the journal of the International Society of Philosophy and Cosmology (ISPC) Vol. 32; pp. 97 - 106
Main Authors Svyrydenko, Denys, Boichenko, Nataliia, Bondarenko, Galyna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published International Society of Philosophy and Cosmology 01.01.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The article is devoted to the analysis of the specifics of the values of contemporary science communication. The values of science are still underestimated by many science researchers, in particular, sociologists. At the same time, the clear definition of the key values of science and intersubjective understanding about them increasingly determine the success of research. After all, values underlie the motivation of human behavior in general and the behavior of a scientist in particular. Academic values should be a priority in motivating the behavior of an individual scientist and science communication in general. Although values indicate to a greater extent what is desired, rather than what is available, they cannot be reduced to an ideal that is absent in reality, because values are already represented in the real behavior of people. The values of science have not only a regulatory nature of intellectual values (the abstract search for scientific truth as a higher goal, the power of the human intellect, academic freedom as an ideal, etc.), but also a specific functional and pragmatic significance – as specific instrumental values (institutional and organizational values, communicative competences, etc.). Despite the fact that values have an interpretive nature, they are neither subjectively limited nor arbitrarily relative to different social groups: the significance of values is determined by the communication in which these values are used by their carriers. The need for collective recognition of the values of science communication appears especially clearly and acutely in the clarification of the problems of ethics and morality of science communication, in particular in the issues of inclusiveness of science communication.
ISSN:2307-3705
2307-3705
DOI:10.29202/phil-cosm/32/7