CT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT Findings of Sinonasal Sarcoma: Differentiation from Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose To evaluate computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) findings for the differentiation of sinonasal sarcoma from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed CT, MR...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology Vol. 75; no. 1; pp. 17 - 25
Main Authors Kim, Jin Ho, Yoon, Dae Young, Baek, Sora, Park, Min Woo, Kwon, Kee Hwan, Rho, Young Soo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The Korean Society of Radiology 01.07.2016
대한영상의학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To evaluate computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) findings for the differentiation of sinonasal sarcoma from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed CT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT results in 20 patients with pathologically proven sinonasal sarcoma (n = 7) and SCC (n = 13). Imaging characteristics of tumors, such as the shape, size, margin, MRI signal intensity, pattern of enhancement, local tumor invasion, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were analyzed and compared between sarcoma and SCC. Results The SUVmax of sarcomas (7.4 ± 2.1) was significantly lower than the SUVmax of the SCCs (14.3 ± 4.5) (p = 0.0013). However, no significant difference in the shape, size, margin, MRI signal intensity, pattern of enhancement, and local tumor invasion was observed between sarcoma and SCC. Conclusion Although CT and MR imaging features are nonspecific, FDG PET/CT is useful in distinguishing between sinonasal sarcoma and SCC based on the SUVmax value.
Bibliography:G704-000499.2016.75.1.007
ISSN:1738-2637
2288-2928
2951-0805
DOI:10.3348/jksr.2016.75.1.17