City/science intersections: A scoping review of science for policy in urban contexts

• Published in: Cities Vol. 152; p. 105132
• Main Authors: Manrique Rueda, Gabriela, Poirier Stephens, Zoé, Therrien, Marie-Christine, Kestens, Yan, Arnaud, Joris, Pascal, Noémie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2024
• Subjects: Cities; Decision-making; Knowledge co-production; Public policies; Science for urban policy; Transdisciplinary research; Decision-making; Science for urban policy; Knowledge co-production; Cities; Public policies; Transdisciplinary research
• ISSN: 0264-2751; 1873-6084
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105132

Science is essential for cities to understand and intervene on the increasing global risks. However, challenges in effectively utilizing scientific knowledge in decision-making processes limit cities' abilities to address these risks. This scoping review examines the development of science for urban policy, exploring the contextual factors, organizational structures, and mechanisms that facilitate or hinder the integration of science and policy. It investigates the challenges faced and the outcomes achieved. The findings reveal that science has gained influence in United Nations (UN) policy discourses related to sustainable development, and climate change and different disciplines have developed research on science for urban policy, leading to the expansion of international, regional, and national networks connecting science and policy. Boundary-spanning organizations and collaborative research initiatives with stakeholders have emerged, creating platforms for dialogue, knowledge sharing, and experimentation. However, cultural differences between the science and policy realms and power imbalances in research processes impede the effective utilization of scientific knowledge in decision-making. While efforts are being made to develop methods and tools for knowledge co-production, translation, and mobilization, more attention is needed to establish systemic science-for-policy organizational structures and address power imbalances in research processes that give rise to ethical challenges. •Organizational structures and disciplinary developments to improve the use of science for urban policy- have expanded in the sustainable development, and climate change contexts.•Efforts have focused on the development of methods, and tools for knowledge co-production, translation, and mobilization.•The power imbalances inherent to collaborative research processes must be addressed.