Weighted, Circular and Semi-Algebraic Proofs

In recent years there has been an increasing interest in studying proof systems stronger than Resolution, with the aim of building more efficient SAT solvers based on them. In defining these proof systems, we try to find a balance between the power of the proof system (the size of the proofs require...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of artificial intelligence research Vol. 79; pp. 447 - 482
Main Authors Bonacina, Ilario, Bonet, Maria Luisa, Levy, Jordi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.01.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In recent years there has been an increasing interest in studying proof systems stronger than Resolution, with the aim of building more efficient SAT solvers based on them. In defining these proof systems, we try to find a balance between the power of the proof system (the size of the proofs required to refute a formula) and the difficulty of finding the proofs. In this paper we consider the proof systems circular Resolution, Sherali-Adams, Nullstellensatz and Weighted Resolution and we study their relative power from a theoretical perspective. We prove that circular Resolution, Sherali-Adams and Weighted Resolution are polynomially equivalent proof systems. We also prove that Nullstellensatz is polynomially equivalent to a restricted version of Weighted Resolution. The equivalences carry on also for versions of the systems where the coefficients/weights are expressed in unary. The practical interest in these systems comes from the fact that they admit efficient algorithms to find proofs in case these have small width/degree.
ISSN:1076-9757
1076-9757
DOI:10.1613/jair.1.15075