Keywords and collocations in US presidential discourse since 1993: a corpus-assisted analysis

• Published in: Journal of humanities and applied social science Vol. 3; no. 2; pp. 137 - 158
• Main Author: Hamed, Dalia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bingley Emerald Group Publishing Limited 23.04.2021; Emerald Publishing
• Subjects: Analysis; collocations; Comorbidity; Cooperation; corpus analysis; Corpus linguistics; Dictionaries; Discourse analysis; Discourses; Immigration; International relations; Keywords; Language; Linguistics; Presidents; Quantitative analysis; Research methodology; Software; Speeches; Terrorism; us presidential discourse; Words; United States > US
• ISSN: 2632-279X; 2632-279X
• DOI: 10.1108/JHASS-01-2020-0019

Purpose The purpose of this study is to apply a corpus-assisted analysis of keywords and their collocations in the US presidential discourse from Clinton to Trump to discover the meanings of these words and the collocates they have. Keywords are salient words in a corpus whose frequency is unusually high (positive keywords) or low (negative keywords) in comparison with a reference corpus. Collocation is the co-occurrence of words. Design/methodology/approach To achieve this purpose, the investigation of keywords and collocations is generated by AntConc, a corpus processing software. Findings This analysis leads to shed light on the similarities and/or differences amongst the past four American presidents concerning their key topics. Keyword analysis through keyness makes it evident that Clinton and Obama, being Democrats, demonstrate a clear tendency to improve Americans’ life inside their social sphere. Obama surpasses Clinton as regard foreign affairs. Clinton and Obama’s infrequent subjects have to do with terrorism and immigration. This complies with their condensed focus on social and economic improvements. Bush, a republican, concentrates only on external issues. This is proven by his keywords signifying war against terrorism. Bush’s negative use of words marking cooperative actions conforms to his positive use of words indicating external war. Trump’s positive keywords are about exaggerated descriptions without a defined target. He also shows an unusual frequency in referring to his name and position. His words used with negative keyness refer to reforming programs and external issues. Collocations around each top content keyword clarify the word and harmonize with the presidential orientation negotiated by the keywords. Research limitations/implications Limitations have to do with the issue of the accurate representation of the samples. Originality/value This research is original in its methodology of applying corpus linguistics tools in the analysis of presidential discourses.