Efficacy and safety of the α4β2 neuronal nicotinic receptor agonist ABT-894 in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain

In 2 well-controlled phase 2 clinical trials, the selective α4β2 neuronal nicotinic receptor agonist ABT-894 was found to be ineffective in treating patients with diabetic neuropathic pain. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that neuronal nicotinic receptor (NNR) agonists may be a novel and ef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPain (Amsterdam) Vol. 153; no. 4; pp. 862 - 868
Main Authors Rowbotham, Michael C., Arslanian, Armen, Nothaft, Wolfram, Duan, W. Rachel, Best, Andrea E., Pritchett, Yili, Zhou, Qian, Stacey, Brett R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia, PA Elsevier B.V 01.04.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In 2 well-controlled phase 2 clinical trials, the selective α4β2 neuronal nicotinic receptor agonist ABT-894 was found to be ineffective in treating patients with diabetic neuropathic pain. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that neuronal nicotinic receptor (NNR) agonists may be a novel and effective therapy for numerous painful conditions. Analgesic efficacy and safety of the highly selective α4β2 NNR agonist ABT-894 was evaluated in 2 separate randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). Study 1 (280 patients randomized) tested 1, 2, and 4mg ABT-894 twice daily compared with placebo and 60mg duloxetine once per day over 8weeks of treatment. Study 2 (124 patients randomized) tested 6mg ABT-894 twice daily vs placebo for 8weeks. The primary efficacy outcome measure in both studies was the weekly mean of the 24-hour average pain score recorded in each patient’s diary. In both trials, none of the ABT-894 dose groups showed efficacy compared with placebo, whereas duloxetine achieved a statistically significant improvement over placebo in Study 1. All dose levels of ABT-894 were well tolerated, and no significant safety issues were identified. These results are in contrast to the outcome of a previously reported study of DPNP using the less selective α4β2 NNR agonist ABT-594, which demonstrated efficacy compared with placebo, albeit with significant tolerability limitations. The failure of the highly selective α4β2 NNR agonist ABT-894 indicates that it may not be possible to define a therapeutic index for this mechanism or that selectively targeting α4β2 NNRs may not be a viable approach to treating neuropathic pain.
ISSN:0304-3959
1872-6623
DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2012.01.009