Validity and Reliability of questionnaires measuring attitudes to oral health: A review of the literature

BackgroundThe instruments used to assess attitudes to oral health must be validated in order for their results to be reliable and comparable with other variables. The aim of this review was to analyze the ability of self-administered questionnaires to validly and reliably measure attitudes to oral h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry Vol. 14; no. 9; pp. e776 - e781
Main Authors Ríos-León, Rd, Salas-Huallparimache, J., Díaz-Pizán, M., Blanco-Victorio, D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Medicina Oral S.L 01.09.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundThe instruments used to assess attitudes to oral health must be validated in order for their results to be reliable and comparable with other variables. The aim of this review was to analyze the ability of self-administered questionnaires to validly and reliably measure attitudes to oral health. Material and MethodsA bibliographic review was carried out using the following databases, Medline (PubMed), SCOPUS and Web of Science from the year 2016 to 2021, using the keywords: (questionnaire* OR survey*) AND (attitude* OR behav*) AND ("oral health" OR "dental care") AND (validity OR reliability). ResultsA total of 234 original articles were found in the databases, only 22 met the selection criteria, of which 13 were aimed at patients and nine at health professionals. Evidence of validity and reliability was determined using "COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments" (COSMIN). ConclusionsMost of the articles partially meet the validity and reliability criteria. Key words:Questionnaire, attitude, behavior, oral health, validity and reliability.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1989-5488
1989-5488
DOI:10.4317/jced.59455