Trends in NICE technology appraisals of non-small cell lung cancer drugs over the last decade

• Published in: The European journal of health economics
• Main Authors: Westerink, Lotte, Wolters, Sharon, Zhou, Guiling, Postma, Arjan, Boersma, Cornelis, van Boven, Job Frank Martien, Postma, Maarten Jacobus
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany 30.08.2024
• Subjects: Technology appraisals; HTA; NSCLC; UK; NICE; Review; Cost-effectiveness
• ISSN: 1618-7598; 1618-7601; 1618-7601
• DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01711-0

The aim of this study is to analyse the trends in technology appraisals for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatments performed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) over the last ten years. A systematic search was conducted for single technology appraisals of NSCLC drugs in the online NICE database from 2012 to 2022. Search terms used were 'non small cell lung cancer', and 'NSCLC'. Appraisals that were under development or terminated as well as multiple technology appraisals were considered out of scope. In the 30 included appraisals for targeted therapies and immunotherapies within NSCLC, a total of 53 different comparators were included by NICE for 41 assorted indications or subgroups. Partitioned survival models were most frequently used, often including three health states and time horizons of up to 30 years. Throughout the decade the use of indirect comparisons was high and became more established and complex over time. Of all appraisals, 90% positively recommended the treatment for use in the UK. Technology appraisals became more complex over time due to the emergence of targeted therapies and immunotherapies, leading to multiple different indications, subpopulations and comparators that needed to be included in appraisals. Partitioned Survival Analysis (PartSA) models became the cornerstone within NSCLC, with time horizons up to 30 years and over time methods for indirect treatment comparisons became more established. The majority of the appraisals resulted in a positive recommendation for reimbursement.