Clinical usefulness of four-dimensional dynamic ventilation CT for borderline resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of four-dimensional dynamic ventilation CT (4DCT) for assessing resectability in borderline resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer (BR-LAEC) and confirmed the pathological validity of the 4DCT results in surgery without prior treatment. W...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese journal of radiology
Main Authors Oda, Shioto, Kuno, Hirofumi, Fujita, Takeo, Hiyama, Takashi, Kotani, Daisuke, Kadota, Tomohiro, Sakashita, Shingo, Kobayashi, Tatsushi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan 19.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of four-dimensional dynamic ventilation CT (4DCT) for assessing resectability in borderline resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer (BR-LAEC) and confirmed the pathological validity of the 4DCT results in surgery without prior treatment. We retrospectively reviewed 128 patients (107 men; median age, 68 [range, 43-89] years) diagnosed with BR-LAEC on initial conventional CT (i-CT). These patients were initially classified into three categories: BR1 (closer to resectable), BR2 (resectability not assessable), or BR3 (closer to unresectable). Subsequent 4DCT reclassified patients as either resectable or unresectable within 1 week of i-CT. We analyzed the diagnostic shift induced by 4DCT. Additionally, 18 patients who underwent surgery without prior treatment were evaluated using 4DCT and pathological outcomes. 4DCT reclassified patients with BR-LAEC as resectable (57.0%; 73/128) and unresectable (43.0%; 55/128). Of 53 patients initially classified as BR1, 32.1% (17/53) were reclassified as unresectable, and of 47 patients initially classified as BR3, 46.8% (22/47) were reclassified as resectable. Among 28 patients initially classified as BR2, 53.6% (15/27) were reclassified as resectable and 46.4% (13/27) as unresectable. In the surgery-only cohort of 18 patients, 9 were initially classified as BR1 and 9 as BR2, and all were reclassified as resectable. These patients were pathologically confirmed to have resectable disease. 4DCT may provide information complementary to that provided by initial conventional CT in assessing resectability among patients with BR-LAEC, and could be a useful adjunct tool for guiding clinical decisions in this patient population.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1867-1071
1867-108X
1867-108X
DOI:10.1007/s11604-024-01678-1