Alain Badiou’s Suturing of the Law to the Event and the State of Exception
This article questions whether we can posit a more radical desuturing of the law from the event: Can radical shifts in law produce events? Can the law itself be an event, thereby conditioning the very nature of the event itself, creating a new subjectivity and a new time? I would like to argue that...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of French and Francophone philosophy Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 192 - 204 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
12.10.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2155-1162 2155-1162 |
DOI | 10.5195/jffp.2016.712 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This article questions whether we can posit a more radical desuturing of the law from the event: Can radical shifts in law produce events? Can the law itself be an event, thereby conditioning the very nature of the event itself, creating a new subjectivity and a new time? I would like to argue that the law can do so. How? Badiou begins “The Three Negations” by discussing the work of the German jurist Carl Schmitt (TN 1877). I would like to argue that the state of exception, as elaborated by Carl Schmitt, can serve as the willed decision of a sovereign that brings about an event. We can understand the sovereign as a kind of legal subject that has the force to bring about a new event, rupturing with an established order and introducing a new form of subjectivity and time. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2155-1162 2155-1162 |
DOI: | 10.5195/jffp.2016.712 |