The Impact of Promotions on the Convergence in Preference Elicitation Methods

Three methods frequently used in research to assess product preferences were compared to determine their degree of convergence. These methods included: (1) constant sum scale, a subjective probability measure, (2) conjoint measurement, and (3) actual choice. These methods were analyzed along context...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of promotion management Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 3 - 17
Main Author Myers, Chris A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Binghamton Taylor & Francis Group 09.08.2006
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Brand preference
Conjoint analysis
constant sum scale
Consumer behavior
context
convergence
Market shares
multiple data sources
Preferences
Product choice
promotions
Psychology
Sales promotions
Soft drinks
Studies
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Three methods frequently used in research to assess product preferences were compared to determine their degree of convergence. These methods included: (1) constant sum scale, a subjective probability measure, (2) conjoint measurement, and (3) actual choice. These methods were analyzed along context, i.e., non-promotion versus promotion. Subjects were 43 university personnel. Subjects utilized each of the measures to rate their preferences for 9 soft drink brands. Methods were found to exhibit a strong degree of convergence for large market share brands. This may suggest that the elicitation methods may be measuring similar constructs when preferences are high and market share is high. However, when preferences are low and market share is low, contexts effects (i.e., promotions) may reduce the amount of convergence in preference elicitation methods.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:1049-6491
1540-7594
DOI:10.1300/J057v12n02_02