Ketamine-propofol versus ketamine-midazolam for procedural sedation and analgesia in children with hematological malignancies: a randomized, open-labeled, cross-over trial
Background The use of procedural sedation and analgesia for painful procedures in children with hematological malignancies has become a standard practice in recent time. We compared the occurrence of hypoxia, apnea, and pain between ketamine-propofol and ketamine-midazolam combination. Patients and...
Saved in:
Published in | Research and Opinion in Anesthesia & Intensive Care Vol. 5; no. 3; pp. 198 - 204 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Mumbai
Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd
01.07.2018
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background The use of procedural sedation and analgesia for painful procedures in children with hematological malignancies has become a standard practice in recent time. We compared the occurrence of hypoxia, apnea, and pain between ketamine-propofol and ketamine-midazolam combination.
Patients and methods This randomized, open-labeled cross-over study was conducted in 60 children aged 1-15 years scheduled for bone marrow aspiration and, or intrathecal chemotherapy. They were divided into two groups of 30 to receive either ketamine-propofol or ketamine-midazolam. Sedation was performed by trained anesthetists according to the study protocol. Data were analyzed with independent t-test, χ2-test and Fisher's exact test. P value 0.05 or less was considered significant.
Results A total of 120 procedures were performed. One (1.7%) patient in each group had hypoxia, (P=0.8). The oxygen saturation decreased to 83 and 88% in ketamine-propofol and ketamine-midazolam groups, respectively. This was accompanied by bradycardia with a heart rate of 56 and 58 beats/min, respectively. Both events responded to oxygen therapy. There was no episode of apnea, and all maintained spontaneous respiration. The number of patients with a pain score of at least 5 during the procedure was comparable; ketamine-propofol group [6 (10%)] versus ketamine-midazolam group [4 (6.7%)] (P=0.4). Hallucinations were more common in the ketamine-propofol group [4(6.7%)] than the ketamine-midazolam group [0 (0%)] (P=0.05).
Conclusion The occurrence of hypoxia, apnea, and pain was comparable following the administration of ketamine-propofol and ketamine-midazolam combination. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2356-9115 2356-9123 |
DOI: | 10.4103/roaic.roaic_54_17 |