Comparison between L and E gene amplification analytical methods for human papillomavirus typing

L and E6/E7 gene amplification analyses were compared to identify human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and verify the HPV type, with the intent to minimize HPV typing errors. L1 gene verified HPV typing was accomplished via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and membrane assays. Verification of HPV typ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of gynecologic oncology Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 251 - 255
Main Authors Cho, Hong-Bum, Kim, Young-Jae, Kim, Kyung-Tai
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy 01.12.2008
대한부인종양학회
Subjects
Original
산부인과학
E6/E7 gene
Human papillomavirus
L1 gene
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:L and E6/E7 gene amplification analyses were compared to identify human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and verify the HPV type, with the intent to minimize HPV typing errors. L1 gene verified HPV typing was accomplished via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and membrane assays. Verification of HPV typing via E6/E7 genes was accomplished through nested multiplexed PCR. The results from 104 samples were compared. The rates of accordance and difference were 35% and 65%, respectively. For 29% of the analyses, nested multiplexed PCR was more diversified than the membrane assay. HPV can be classified into low-risk HPV and high-risk HPV groups. In parallel amplifications of the L and E genes is more efficient for accurate diagnosis in light of the different symptoms and attendant precautions of the risk groups.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
G704-001660.2008.19.4.008
ISSN:2005-0380
2005-0399
DOI:10.3802/jgo.2008.19.4.251