Noninvasive Imaging of Endothelial Damage in Patients With Different HbA1c Levels: A Proof-of-Concept Study

The aim of this study was to compare endothelial permeability, which is considered a hallmark of coronary artery disease, between patients with different HbA1c levels using an albumin-binding magnetic resonance (MR) probe. This cross-sectional study included 26 patients with clinical indication for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 68; no. 2; pp. 387 - 394
Main Authors Engel, Leif-Christopher, Landmesser, Ulf, Goehler, Alexander, Gigengack, Kevin, Wurster, Thomas-Heinrich, Manes, Costantina, Girke, Georg, Jaguszewski, Milosz, Skurk, Carsten, Leistner, David M., Lauten, Alexander, Schuster, Andreas, Noutsias, Michel, Hamm, Bernd, Botnar, Rene M., Bigalke, Boris, Makowski, Marcus R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.02.2019
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study was to compare endothelial permeability, which is considered a hallmark of coronary artery disease, between patients with different HbA1c levels using an albumin-binding magnetic resonance (MR) probe. This cross-sectional study included 26 patients with clinical indication for X-ray angiography who were classified into three groups according to HbA1c level (<5.7% [<39 mmol/mol], 5.7–6.4% [39–47 mmol/mol], and ≥6.5% [48 mmol/mol]). Subjects underwent gadofosveset-enhanced coronary magnetic resonance and X-ray angiography including optical coherence within 24 h. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were assessed to measure the probe uptake in the coronary wall by coronary segment, excluding those with culprit lesions in X-ray angiography. In the group of patients with HbA1c levels between 5.7 and 6.4%, 0.30 increased normalized CNR values were measured, compared with patients with HbA1c levels <5.7% (0.30 [95% CI 0.04, 0.57]). In patients with HbA1c levels ≥6.5%, we found 0.57 higher normalized CNR values compared with patients with normal HbA1c levels (0.57 [95% CI 0.28, 0.85]) and 0.26 higher CNR values for patients with HbA1c level ≥6.5% compared with patients with HbA1c levels between 5.7 and 6.4% (0.26 [95% CI −0.04, 0.57]). Additionally, late atherosclerotic lesions were more common in patients with high HbA1c levels (HbA1c ≥6.5%, n = 14 [74%]; HbA1c 5.7–6.4%, n = 6 [60%]; and HbA1c <5.7%, n = 10 [53%]). In conclusion, coronary MRI in combination with an albumin-binding MR probe suggests that both patients with intermediate and patients with high HbA1c levels are associated with a higher extent of endothelial damage of the coronary arteries compared with patients with HbA1c levels <5.7%.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0012-1797
1939-327X
1939-327X
DOI:10.2337/db18-0239