Determining Cutoff Point in Bahasa Malaysia Version of Voice Handicap Index-10 (mVHI-10)

Determining the cutoff point on Bahasa Malaysia version of Voice Handicap Index (mVHI-10) questionnaire scores for distinguishing between dysphonic and normal voice samples. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the tertiary hospital, Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck clinic. The study involved 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of voice
Main Authors Idris, Fathiyah, Azman, Mawaddah, Mohd Zawawi, Nor Shahrina, Mat Baki, Marina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 25.07.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Determining the cutoff point on Bahasa Malaysia version of Voice Handicap Index (mVHI-10) questionnaire scores for distinguishing between dysphonic and normal voice samples. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the tertiary hospital, Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck clinic. The study involved 205 subjects (105 in the dysphonia group; 100 in the normal group) with a complete database of flexible laryngoscopy/stroboscopy, voice recording, acoustic analysis, and mVHI-10 score. A sample with a discrepancy between subjective evaluation and acoustic analysis results was excluded from the study. Each classified dataset matched with the respective mVHI-10 questionnaire score. Finally, all the collected data were subjected to data analysis. The best cutoff point for mVHI-10 was 7.5 by the receiver operating characteristic curve, with an area under the curve value of 0.997. Its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 92.4%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 93.0%, respectively. The best cutoff point for mVHI-10 is 7.5, as determined by stringent data evaluation and rigorous statistical analysis. With excellent diagnostic accuracy properties, it enhances the usage of the mVHI-10 questionnaire as an excellent screening tool. Nevertheless, we advocate multidimensional voice assessment for diagnostic purposes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0892-1997
1873-4588
DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.05.021