Ambulatory pouch and anal motility in patients with ileo-anal reservoirs

Twelve patients were studied for a median of 18 hours (range 8.5-21.5 hr) by continuous, ambulatory, simultaneous pouch and anal manometry 10-85 months after restorative proctocolectomy. Two main patterns of motility were observed: (1) Large isolated contractions up to 68 cm H2O in amplitude and up...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of colorectal disease Vol. 9; no. 1; p. 40
Main Authors Levitt, M D, Kamm, M A, van der Sijp, J R, Nicholls, R J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany 01.04.1994
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Twelve patients were studied for a median of 18 hours (range 8.5-21.5 hr) by continuous, ambulatory, simultaneous pouch and anal manometry 10-85 months after restorative proctocolectomy. Two main patterns of motility were observed: (1) Large isolated contractions up to 68 cm H2O in amplitude and up to 67 seconds in duration were present in ten patients. These were often associated with the urge to defaecate and were more frequent before defaecation than after but did not appear to be associated with expulsion of faeces from the pouch. In two patients atypical large isolated contractions up to 378 cm H2O in amplitude were observed. (2) Rhythmic contractions at a frequency of 7-11 per minute and amplitude of 24-330 cm H2O, occurred for a duration of 18 seconds to 18 minutes in six patients. In the other six patients this motility pattern was not seen. Of the 12 patients nine were considered to have good function (five or less bowel actions per 24 hours) and three poor function (ten or more bowel actions per 24 hours). Rhythmic activity was the predominant motility pattern in all three with poor function whereas large isolated contractions predominated in those with good function, although there was considerable overlap in the types of motility observed between patients with good and poor function. Mean pouch pressure tended to be higher in patients with poor function than in those with good function both throughout the entire recording and during sleep. In a number of patients simultaneous anal recordings revealed the presence of slow waves and falls in pressure, some of which were associated with a simultaneous rise in pouch pressure.
ISSN:0179-1958
1432-1262
DOI:10.1007/BF00304299