Integration of the modified double layer potential of the vector boundary element method for eddy current problems

The boundary element method for the eddy current problem (BEM-ECP) was proposed in a number of papers and is applicable to important tasks such as the problem of inductive heating and transmission of electromagnetic energy. BEM-ECP requires the construction of a system of linear algebraic equations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of applied mathematics Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 385 - 407
Main Authors SIVAK, S., STUPAKOV, I., ROYAK, M., ROYAK, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge Cambridge University Press 01.04.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0956-7925
1469-4425
DOI10.1017/S0956792522000183

Cover

More Information
Summary:The boundary element method for the eddy current problem (BEM-ECP) was proposed in a number of papers and is applicable to important tasks such as the problem of inductive heating and transmission of electromagnetic energy. BEM-ECP requires the construction of a system of linear algebraic equations in which the matrix is inherently dense and is constructed out of element matrices. For the process of the element matrix computation, two cases are normally considered: far-field interaction and near-field interaction, because the construction of element matrices requires integration of a singular function. In this article, we suggest a transform that allows computing the matrix components of the near-singular interaction part while implementing only the single and double layer potentials. The previously suggested modified double layer potential (MDLP) can be integrated by means of this transform, which simplifies the program implementation of BEM-ECP significantly. Solving model problems, we analyse the drawbacks of the previously suggested approach. This analysis includes the proof of the MDLP singularity that makes the integration of this potential a rather difficult task without the help of our transform. The previously suggested approach does not work well with surfaces that are not smooth. Our approach does consider such cases, which is its main advantage. We demonstrate this on the model problems with known analytical solutions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0956-7925
1469-4425
DOI:10.1017/S0956792522000183