The Association of Female and Male Preconception Dyslipidemia with Live Birth in Couples Seeking Fertility Treatment

Dyslipidemia is common, and resultant endothelial dysfunction may impact reproductive outcomes. No prospective study has examined the effect of preconception lipid parameters in both female and male partners or their interaction on live birth. To determine whether live birth is associated with preco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
Main Authors Bollig, Kassie J, Barnhart, Kurt T, Schisterman, Enrique F, Johnstone, Erica Boiman, Peterson, C Matthew, Hotaling, James M, Ryan, Ginny, Van Voorhis, Bradley J, Carrell, Douglas T, Mendola, Pauline, Mills, James L, Harhay, Michael O, Zee, Jarcy, Mumford, Sunni L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 24.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Dyslipidemia is common, and resultant endothelial dysfunction may impact reproductive outcomes. No prospective study has examined the effect of preconception lipid parameters in both female and male partners or their interaction on live birth. To determine whether live birth is associated with preconception lipids in both partners by planned fertility treatment. Secondary analysis of the Folic Acid and Zinc Supplementation Trial, conducted between June 2013-December 2017. Couples were followed for nine months after randomization and until delivery. Multicenter study. Couples seeking fertility treatment (n = 2370; females 18-45 years, males ≥18 years). Female, male, and couple abnormal versus normal preconception lipid concentrations (total cholesterol [TC], low-density lipoprotein [LDL], high-density lipoprotein [HDL], triglycerides [TG]). Live birth. Among 2370 couples, most males (84%) and females (76%) had at least one abnormal lipid parameter. Males planning in vitro fertilization (IVF, n = 373) with elevated LDL had lower probability of live birth than those with normal levels (47.4% vs. 59.7%, aRR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.98). In couples planning IVF where both partners had elevated TC or LDL, live birth was lower than those with normal levels (TC: 32.4% vs. 58.0%, aRR 0.53, 95% CI 0.36-0.79; and LDL: 41.9% vs. 63.8%, aRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.85). Lipid parameters were not associated with live birth for couples planning non-IVF treatments. Couples planning IVF where both partners had elevated TC or LDL and males planning IVF with elevated LDL had decreased probability of live birth. These findings may support lipid screening in patients seeking fertility treatment for prognostic information for reproductive outcomes.
ISSN:1945-7197
DOI:10.1210/clinem/dgae427