Evaluating a university's investment in arts programming on student arts participation

An individual's level of education has the strongest relationship with his or her arts participation. What is unclear, however, is why high-educated individuals are more likely to participate in the arts. Economic models indicate that price, income, and background are relevant to attendance, bu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCultural trends Vol. 28; no. 5; pp. 366 - 378
Main Authors Hale, Jessica Sherrod, Woronkowicz, Joanna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Routledge 20.10.2019
Subjects
accessibility
Arts participation
arts socialization
higher education
impact
programme evaluation
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:An individual's level of education has the strongest relationship with his or her arts participation. What is unclear, however, is why high-educated individuals are more likely to participate in the arts. Economic models indicate that price, income, and background are relevant to attendance, but the role these factors play among high-educated groups, like college students, remains underexplored. This study sheds light on what makes college students more likely to participate in the arts by evaluating a university's investment in arts programming on campus. We analyse data from an experiment in which a university made substantial investments in arts programming largely centred on increasing access to the arts by providing more free programmes. Using pre- and post-intervention survey data, we analyse changes in students' reported level of arts participation and barriers to arts involvement. The results from our analyses show that background, such as familiarity and experience in the arts, is the strongest predictor of increased arts participation among college students when prices are reduced.
ISSN:0954-8963
1469-3690
DOI:10.1080/09548963.2019.1679993