ACTR-40. PHASE 2 SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF AR-67 (7-T-BUTYLDIMETHYLSILTYL-10-HYDROXYCAMPTOTHECIN) IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME (GBM) OR GLIOSARCOMA
Abstract BACKGROUND AR-67 (formerly DB-67) is a novel 3rd generation camptothecin with improved safety and lipophilicity than current drugs in this class. Safety and efficacy of AR-67 were evaluated in a Phase 2 study in recurrent GBM/gliosarcoma in adult patients. METHODS AR-67 (7.5 mg/m2) was admi...
Saved in:
Published in | Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Vol. 21; no. Supplement_6; p. vi22 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
US
Oxford University Press
11.11.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract
BACKGROUND
AR-67 (formerly DB-67) is a novel 3rd generation camptothecin with improved safety and lipophilicity than current drugs in this class. Safety and efficacy of AR-67 were evaluated in a Phase 2 study in recurrent GBM/gliosarcoma in adult patients.
METHODS
AR-67 (7.5 mg/m2) was administered once daily by IV infusion for 5 consecutive days on a 21-day cycle. Cohort 1 patients (N=31/46 enrolled) had not received (or had not recently failed) bevacizumab. Cohort 2 patients (N=13/46 enrolled) had failed bevacizumab within 90 days before screening. Cohort assignments for 2/46 patients were undetermined. Tumor response was assessed ≥14d after every second cycle and before every third cycle using MRI. Primary endpoints were 6-month PFS (Cohort 1), and 2-month PFS (Cohort 2).
RESULTS
45/46 patients received ≥ one dose of AR-67; one patient (Cohort 1) died prior to dosing. Efficacy: 6/30 (Cohort 1) and 2/13 (Cohort 2) treated patients achieved the primary endpoints of 6- and 2-month PFS, respectively. Across the study, PR was the best overall response in 3/45 treated patients, all in Cohort 1. SD was the best overall disease response in 7/45 treated patients (5 in Cohort 1 and 2 in Cohort2). Safety: AR-67 was well tolerated; 17 patients (38%) exhibited serious adverse events (SAEs) including headache and Grade 4/5 muscular weakness (2.2%). Most TEAEs were mild/moderate in intensity and Grade 1–3 intoxicity. Notably absent was Grade 4 diarrhea, a hallmark of other approved camptothecin chemotherapies.
CONCLUSIONS
AR-67 was well tolerated and exhibited a safety profile consistent with or better than currently approved camptothecins. 6/30 treated patients in Cohort 1 and 2/13 patients in Cohort 2 achieved the primary endpoints of 6- and 2-month PFS, respectively. PR was the best overall response in 3/45 treated patients and SD was the best overall response in 7/45 patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-8517 1523-5866 |
DOI: | 10.1093/neuonc/noz175.082 |