First Report of Porcine Parvovirus 2 (PPV2) in Pigs from Colombia Associated with Porcine Reproductive Failure (PRF) and Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex (PRDC)

Pigs are affected by various parvoviruses (PPVs); eight have been reported to date (PPV1–PPV8). Porcine parvovirus 1 is considered a primary agent of porcine reproductive failure (PRF), while it is unknown whether other PPVs impact porcine health. Recently, the presence of PPV2 has been confirmed in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransboundary and emerging diseases Vol. 2024; pp. 1 - 11
Main Authors Vargas-Bermudez, Diana S., Mainenti, Marta, Naranjo-Ortiz, María F., Mogollon, José Darío, Piñeyro, Pablo, Jaime, Jairo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
German
Published Berlin Hindawi 16.05.2024
Hindawi Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Pigs are affected by various parvoviruses (PPVs); eight have been reported to date (PPV1–PPV8). Porcine parvovirus 1 is considered a primary agent of porcine reproductive failure (PRF), while it is unknown whether other PPVs impact porcine health. Recently, the presence of PPV2 has been confirmed in the lung, either as a single agent or in the form of coinfection with other respiratory; therefore, it has been proposed as a potential participant in the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC). In the present study, the presence of PPV2 alone and coinfection with other viruses (PCV2, PCV3, and PRRSV) was evaluated in lung samples obtained from pigs with respiratory signs (respiratory group: RG) (n = 146) and stillborn lungs (stillborn group: SG) (n = 19) from 82 farms in the five regions with the highest swine production in Colombia. The overall PPV2 prevalence was 37.6% (62/165), with the highest proportion mainly detected in grow-finisher pigs (62.5%), while its herd prevalence was 51.2% (42/82). The most prevalent virus was PRRSV in both groups, while PPV2 alone was found only in the RG group. The most common dual coinfection in the RG and SG was PCV2/PRRSV (17.8% and 10.5%), while the most frequent coinfections involving PPV2 in the RG were PPV2/PCV2 (7.5%) and PPV2/PRRSV (4%) and PPV2/PCV2 (5.3%) in the SG. The most common triple coinfection was PPV2/PCV2/PRRSV at 15% in the RG and 21% in the SG, while quadruple coinfection PVV2/PCV2/PCV3/PRRSV was detected only in the RG (5.5%). Histopathological evaluation of 21 PPV2-positive lungs showed variable degrees of histiocytic or lymphohistiocytic interstitial pneumonia (9%) in the RG, while no significant changes were observed in SG; in addition, neutrophilic bronchopneumonia was observed in 73.7% if cases evaluated. In situ hybridization-RNAScope® confirmed the presence of PPV2 within pulmonary lesions in 2/19 RG pigs, while no in situ detection was observed in the SG pigs. The phylogenetic evaluation of seven PPV2 sequences detected in Colombia was compared with another 102 reported sequences, indicating that the Colombian strains are located in clade 2. Our results confirm the presence of PPV2 in pigs with PRDC alone and pigs coinfected with PCV2, PCV3, and PRRSV. Likewise, its presence alone or in coinfection in stillbirths suggests that PPV2 is also involved in PRF.
ISSN:1865-1674
1865-1682
DOI:10.1155/2024/1471536