A Study to Assess Perception of Nursing Students about the Effectiveness of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) during Perineal Care Procedure in the selected College of Metropolitan City

Aim: 1. To conduct OSCE 2. To assess the perception of nursing students about OSCE 3. To compare the perception of nursing students between traditional evaluation (TE) and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Material and methods: The research approach and design were Qualitative Descri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Journal of Nursing Education and Research pp. 425 - 428
Main Author Kshirsagar, Shweta Saisagar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Raipur Athena Information Solutions Pvt. Ltd 31.12.2021
Subjects
Feedback
Hygiene
Knowledge
Laboratories
Learning
Nursing
Nursing education
Nursing students
Periodic health examinations
Physical diagnosis
Professionals
Sample size
Skills
Students
Teaching
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2347-8640
2454-2660
DOI10.52711/2454-2660.2021.00098

Cover

More Information
Summary:Aim: 1. To conduct OSCE 2. To assess the perception of nursing students about OSCE 3. To compare the perception of nursing students between traditional evaluation (TE) and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Material and methods: The research approach and design were Qualitative Descriptive. The subjects were 30 students of 4th year Basic BSc Nursing. OSCE conducted under 4 stations namely Hygiene, Execution, Interaction, and Feedback. Data was collected using Demographic data profile; Clinical checklist for hand washing, perineal care SOP; related viva and opinionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Hygiene- 16.69% (5) had excellent, 66.6% (19) had Very good, 19.98% (6) had Good score & none of them had an Average or poor score in hand washing. Execution- 73.26% (22) had excellent, 16% (5) had Very good, 9.99% (3) had Good score & none of them had an Average or poor score in vital signs assessment. Interaction- 56.61% (17) had excellent, 43.29% (13) had Very good score &none of them had a Good, Average or poor score in viva. Feedback- 10 Opinionnaire on personal perception about OSCE administered to participants. 100% (30) of them had positively responded. Conclusion: OSCE proved to be an excellent method of clinical evaluation than traditional evaluation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2347-8640
2454-2660
DOI:10.52711/2454-2660.2021.00098