СOMPARATIVE EFFICIENCY OF USE OF METHYLETHYLPYRIDINOL BY THE ENDONASAL ELECTROPHORESIS AND PARABULBAR INJECTIONS AT THE CHORIORETINAL DYSTROPHY
Research objective: comparative assessment of efficiency of use of Emoxypin® by an endonasal electrophoresis and parabulbar injections at a chorioretinal dystrophy. Methods: 71 patients (average age of 55±3 years) suffering from a chorioretinal dystrophy of various genesis were in the study. The oph...
Saved in:
Published in | Oftalmologii͡a Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 268 - 273 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Ophthalmology Publishing Group
01.10.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Research objective: comparative assessment of efficiency of use of Emoxypin® by an endonasal electrophoresis and parabulbar injections at a chorioretinal dystrophy. Methods: 71 patients (average age of 55±3 years) suffering from a chorioretinal dystrophy of various genesis were in the study. The ophthalmologic examination included: evaluation of visual acuity, a field of vision, a visual fatigue, a condition of bulbar microcirculation (the general conjunctiva index). Besides, electrophysiological examination was conducted, including critical frequency of merge of flickers and electric sensitivity of an eye. The patients were divided into 2 groups. The main group (28 patients) received Emoxypin® with endonasal electrophoresis and group B (43 patients) received Emoxypin® by parabulbar injections. Results: Results of the statistical analysis in both groups showed visual acuity increasment, expansion of borders of a field of vision, depression of visual fatigability, indicators of electrophysiological examination and bulbar microcirculation improved. Conclusion: The comparative assessment of efficiency of use of Emoxypin® by an endonasal electrophoresis and parabulbar injections at a chorioretinal dystrophic various a genesis showed appreciable medical effect in the course of restoration of visual functions which in some cases (18%) even better effect observed at parabulbar injections. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1816-5095 2500-0845 |
DOI: | 10.18008/1816-5095-2017-3-268-273 |