Adverse drug reactions of macrolide therapy: analysis of spontaneous reports according to the Pharmacovigilance system

Objective. To perform pharmacoepidemiological analysis of spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred during macrolide group antibiotics prescription and registered in the “Pharmacovigilance 2.0” subsystem of the Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare. Materials and Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKlinicheskai︠a︡ mikrobiologii︠a︡ i antimikrobnai︠a︡ khimioterapii︠a Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 34 - 40
Main Authors Skryabina, A.A., Nikiforov, V.V., Shakhmardanov, M.Z., Zastrozhin, M.S., Skryabin, V.Yu, Sychev, D.A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageRussian
Published Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective. To perform pharmacoepidemiological analysis of spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred during macrolide group antibiotics prescription and registered in the “Pharmacovigilance 2.0” subsystem of the Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare. Materials and Methods. A retrospective pharmacoepidemiological analysis of spontaneous reports of ADRs arising from the use of all macrolide and azalide antibiotics registered in Russia and registered in the electronic database of the “Pharmacovigilance 2.0” subsystem of the Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare for the period from 01.04.2019 to 30.11.2022 was performed. Results. Analysis of the number of spontaneous reports of ADRs, their structure, outcomes and severity criteria was performed. The most clinically significant ADRs were identified, the occurrence of which was reported to pharmacovigilance bodies. The results of a retrospective pharmacoepidemiological analysis showed that the development of complications of pharmacotherapy in most cases was associated with the use of azithromycin and clarithromycin. The main clinical manifestations of adverse drug reactions were skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, as well as general disorders and injection site reactions. Conclusions. It was found that the reported events generally corresponded to the general spectrum of ADRs typical for individual representatives of macrolide and azalide antibiotics.
ISSN:1684-4386
2686-9586
DOI:10.36488/cmac.2023.1.34-40