Comparison of rectal midazolam and diazepam for premedication in pediatrie dental patients

Rectally administered midazolam (0.35 mg/kg) and diazepam (0.70 mg/kg) were compared with each other and with placebo for preanesthetic medication in children undergoing dental extractions. All rectal medications were very well accepted, but mask acceptance, improvement in anxiety, and sedation were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of oral and maxillofacial surgery Vol. 51; no. 5; pp. 525 - 529
Main Authors Roelofse, J.A., Van Der Bijl, P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 1993
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Rectally administered midazolam (0.35 mg/kg) and diazepam (0.70 mg/kg) were compared with each other and with placebo for preanesthetic medication in children undergoing dental extractions. All rectal medications were very well accepted, but mask acceptance, improvement in anxiety, and sedation were best in the midazolam group. Improvement in anxiety and sedation were significantly better in the two drug groups than in those patients who had received placebo. Thirty minutes after rectal administration of midazolam, patients showed a decrease in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate. Although these decreases differed significantly from the premedication values, they were probably of little clinical importance. Only minor adverse effects were observed in this study. Overall rectally administered midazolam appeared to be somewhat more efficacious than diazepam.
ISSN:0278-2391
1531-5053
DOI:10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80507-5