'Strategic governance:' the wrong questions?
This review essay discusses the conclusions of Strategic Governance about strategizing, planning, and governing in higher education. The study of joint big decision committees reported in this book is carefully and thoroughly reported, but its conclusion that strategy and legitimate governance are i...
Saved in:
| Published in | Review of higher education Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 101 - 112 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Charlottesville, Va
Johns Hopkins University Press
01.09.1996
The Association for the Study of Higher Education |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Summary: | This review essay discusses the conclusions of Strategic
Governance about strategizing, planning, and governing in higher
education. The study of joint big decision committees reported in
this book is carefully and thoroughly reported, but its conclusion
that strategy and legitimate governance are in tension with one
another may result from too narrow a conceptual starting point. The
review essay concludes that a wider range of adaptions than formal
strategic planning may serve higher education well in a time of
great external challenges. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0162-5748 1090-7009 1090-7009 |
| DOI: | 10.1353/rhe.1996.0004 |