Why academics under‐share research data: A social relational theory
Despite their professed enthusiasm for open science, faculty researchers have been documented as not freely sharing their data; instead, if sharing data at all, they take a minimal approach. A robust research agenda in LIS has documented the data under‐sharing practices in which they engage, and the...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Vol. 75; no. 9; pp. 988 - 1001 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.09.2024
Wiley Periodicals Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Despite their professed enthusiasm for open science, faculty researchers have been documented as not freely sharing their data; instead, if sharing data at all, they take a minimal approach. A robust research agenda in LIS has documented the data under‐sharing practices in which they engage, and the motivations they profess. Using theoretical frameworks from sociology to complement research in LIS, this article examines the broader context in which researchers are situated, theorizing the social relational dynamics in academia that influence faculty decisions and practices relating to data sharing. We advance a theory that suggests that the academy has entered a period of transition, and faculty resistance to data sharing through foot‐dragging is one response to shifting power dynamics. If the theory is borne out empirically, proponents of open access will need to find a way to encourage open academic research practices without undermining the social value of academic researchers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2330-1635 2330-1643 |
DOI: | 10.1002/asi.24938 |