Analysis of Pesticides Residues in Foods by Commercial Kits and a Comparison with Gas Chromatography

Commercial analysis kits for acetylcholinesterase-inhibiting pesticides (AI) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) have been examined in comparison with gas chromatographic (GC) analysis. The AI kit could detect N-methylcarbamate pesticides with better sensitivity than GC analysis. However c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi) Vol. 33; no. 5; pp. 458 - 466_1
Main Authors TSUMURA, Yukari, TONOGAI, Yasuhide, NAKAMURA, Yumiko, MIYATA, Masahiro, KAMAKURA, Kazumasa, HASHIHATA, Naoki, IWATA, Kunihiko, ITO, Sumio, MINABA, Kiyomi, OKI, Yoshinori, KODAMA, Mitsuo, ITO, Yoshio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japanese Society for Food Hygiene and Safety 1992
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Commercial analysis kits for acetylcholinesterase-inhibiting pesticides (AI) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) have been examined in comparison with gas chromatographic (GC) analysis. The AI kit could detect N-methylcarbamate pesticides with better sensitivity than GC analysis. However clean-up of the sample solution prior to detection was required. Carbofuran was detected by ELISA in tubes with recovery in the range of 57-159% and a detection limit of 6ppb, which was about 10 times better than GC analysis. On the other hand, ELISA for aldicarb in wells gave a detection limit of 3ppb, which was 20 times better than GC analysis. However, it gave positive and negative errors in the case of wheat and pumpkin, respectively.
ISSN:0015-6426
1882-1006
DOI:10.3358/shokueishi.33.458