Analysis of Pesticides Residues in Foods by Commercial Kits and a Comparison with Gas Chromatography
Commercial analysis kits for acetylcholinesterase-inhibiting pesticides (AI) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) have been examined in comparison with gas chromatographic (GC) analysis. The AI kit could detect N-methylcarbamate pesticides with better sensitivity than GC analysis. However c...
Saved in:
Published in | Food Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi) Vol. 33; no. 5; pp. 458 - 466_1 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Japanese Society for Food Hygiene and Safety
1992
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Commercial analysis kits for acetylcholinesterase-inhibiting pesticides (AI) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) have been examined in comparison with gas chromatographic (GC) analysis. The AI kit could detect N-methylcarbamate pesticides with better sensitivity than GC analysis. However clean-up of the sample solution prior to detection was required. Carbofuran was detected by ELISA in tubes with recovery in the range of 57-159% and a detection limit of 6ppb, which was about 10 times better than GC analysis. On the other hand, ELISA for aldicarb in wells gave a detection limit of 3ppb, which was 20 times better than GC analysis. However, it gave positive and negative errors in the case of wheat and pumpkin, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0015-6426 1882-1006 |
DOI: | 10.3358/shokueishi.33.458 |