Silencing objections: Social constructions of indifference

This article addresses the question: Why is there so often silence in the face of injustice? Much of this silence is socially constructed, the result of a process through which possible (and, often, previously audible) objections to injustice are muffled, not by modifying the conditions giving rise...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of human rights Vol. 1; no. 2; pp. 187 - 206
Main Author Cohen, Ronald L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 01.06.2002
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article addresses the question: Why is there so often silence in the face of injustice? Much of this silence is socially constructed, the result of a process through which possible (and, often, previously audible) objections to injustice are muffled, not by modifying the conditions giving rise to the objections, but by other means. Not all silences are socially constructed, of course, and some of those that are may have the genuine endorsement of all those who observe them. The author examines those socially constructed silences that are clearly not uncontested or incontestable and, drawing on Stanley Milgram's classic work on obedience to authority and other, more, contemporary social psychological research, attempts to understand the social construction of various forms of silence and their consequences for current and future forms of injustice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1475-4835
1475-4843
DOI:10.1080/14754830210125674