Positive-Unlabeled Learning-Based Hybrid Deep Network for Intelligent Fault Detection

Intelligent fault detection methods based on deep learning have been developed rapidly in recent years. However, most of these methods are based on supervised learning which requires a fully labeled training set. It is difficult to obtain massive labeled samples in real applications incredibly accur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on industrial informatics Vol. 18; no. 7; pp. 4510 - 4519
Main Authors Qian, Min, Li, Yan-Fu, Han, Te
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway IEEE 01.07.2022
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Intelligent fault detection methods based on deep learning have been developed rapidly in recent years. However, most of these methods are based on supervised learning which requires a fully labeled training set. It is difficult to obtain massive labeled samples in real applications incredibly accurately labeled fault samples from an operating system. The lack of labels and label noise becomes a great challenge for fault detection. To tackle this problem, in this article, we propose a positive-unlabeled learning based hybrid network (PUHN). It only needs part of the normal operating samples to be labeled. All other samples (including the rest of the normal samples and all fault samples) are unlabeled, which greatly reduces the labeling cost. PUHN consists of three modules: a nonnegative risk positive-unlabeled (PU) network for training the classifier, a feature extraction module, and a clustering layer for improving data separability and estimating the class priors of PU learning. The three are optimized as a whole and the corresponding optimization strategy is designed. The monitoring data of 24 wind turbines are used to verify the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method. The experimental results indicate that the proposed method is superior to the benchmark methods, and the performance is significantly better than the supervised learning method when there exists label noise.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1551-3203
1941-0050
DOI:10.1109/TII.2021.3121777