Two theorems on the addition of residue classes

It is well known that if a 1,…, a m are residues modulo n and m ⩾ n then some sum a i1 + ⋯ + a ik , i 1 < ⋯ < i k , is 0 (mod n). In recent related work, Sydney Bulman-Fleming and Edward T.H. Wang have studied what they call n-divisible subsequences of a finite sequence σ, and made a number of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiscrete mathematics Vol. 81; no. 1; pp. 11 - 18
Main Author Guichard, David R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.04.1990
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It is well known that if a 1,…, a m are residues modulo n and m ⩾ n then some sum a i1 + ⋯ + a ik , i 1 < ⋯ < i k , is 0 (mod n). In recent related work, Sydney Bulman-Fleming and Edward T.H. Wang have studied what they call n-divisible subsequences of a finite sequence σ, and made a number of conjectures. We confirm two of those conjectures in a more general form. Let f( a 1,…, a m ; j be the number of sums formed from the a i which are congruent to j (mod n). We prove two main theorems: 1. If f( a 1,…, a m ; 0) < 2 m−1 then f ( a 1,hellip;, a m ; 0) ⩽ 3 · 2 m−3 ; 2. Let m ⩾ n. There exist a 1,hellip, a m for which f( a 1,hellip:, a m ; j) is odd if and only if n itis not a power of 2.
ISSN:0012-365X
1872-681X
DOI:10.1016/0012-365X(90)90174-G