RETRACTED: Growth performance, carcass characteristics, and selected meat quality traits of two strains of Pekin duck reared in intensive vs semi-intensive housing systems

• Published in: Animal (Cambridge, England) Vol. 15; no. 2; p. 100087
• Main Authors: Starčević, M., Mahmutović, H., Glamočlija, N., Bašić, M., Andjelković, R., Mitrović, R., Marković, R., Janjić, J., Bošković, M., Baltić, M.Ž.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier B.V 01.02.2021
• Subjects: Animals; Chickens; Cooking; Ducks; Housing, Animal; Meat - analysis; Production system; pH; Growth rate; Carcass composition; Poultry
• ISSN: 1751-7311; 1751-732X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100087

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). The article has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief. The article was derived from the thesis of one of the authors: Utjecaj genotipa i sustava drzanja na kvalitetu pacjeg mesa H. Mahmutovic Faculty of Agriculture of Osijek UDK 637.5’65: 636.082(043) view (nsk.hr) The thesis was not acknowledged in the article, contrary to requirement by the journal. Concerns raised by the Thesis supervisors (Drs. G. Kralik and Z. Kralik) were shared with the corresponding author and the different institutions involved. The analysis performed by the journal concluded that the published article and the thesis report a different number of replicates per treatment (n= 6 vs n=3) and differ in their description of batches of animals delivered at the experimental facilities and starting the experiment at different times (n=1 vs n=3). Overall the analysis of the evidence provided indicates that the statistical model applied to the data is not appropriate to the experimental design. As a result, the study is not reproducible, and findings cannot be considered as reliable. Authorship issues were identified. The thesis supervisors were not associated to the publication. Several co-authors (M. Starčević*, H. Mahmutović, N. Glamočlija, M. Bašić, R. Mitrović, R. Marković, M. Bošković, M.Ž. Baltić) recognised that their contributions were erroneously declared so their authorship remains questionable. The Financial Support Statement is incomplete. Evidence was provided that other sources also contributed to financing the study. Apologies are offered to readers of the journal for any inconvenience this may cause.