Providing home hospice care for LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers: Perceptions and opinions of hospice interdisciplinary care team providers

• Published in: Palliative & supportive care Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 3 - 11
• Main Authors: Cloyes, Kristin G., Jones, Miranda, Gettens, Caroline, Wawrzynski, Sarah E., Bybee, Sara, Tay, Djin L., Reblin, Maija, Ellington, Lee
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.02.2023
• Subjects: Caregivers; Communication; Demographics; Female; Focus groups; Gender Identity; Health care; Hispanic Americans; Hospice Care; Hospices; Humans; Knowledge; LGBTQ people; Male; Original Article; Patient Care Team; Patients; Sexual and Gender Minorities; Transgender persons; United States > US; EOL; End of life; Hospice; Hospice interdisciplinary team; LGBTQ
• ISSN: 1478-9515; 1478-9523
• DOI: 10.1017/S1478951522000657

Hospice patients and caregivers who are members of sexual and gender minority groups (i.e., LGBTQ+) have reported experiencing unmet needs at end of life (EOL). Negative experiences often stem from challenging interactions with healthcare providers due to ineffective or poor communication and providers' heteronormative assumptions and biases. Few studies, however, examine hospice care team (HCT) providers' knowledge, experience, and opinions related to EOL care for LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers despite this being identified as a gap in competency and education. We sought to examine HCT providers' perceptions regarding (1) awareness of LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers; (2) knowledge of specific or unique needs; and (3) opinions on best care and communication practices. Six focus groups conducted with HCT providers ( = 48) currently delivering hospice care in three US states were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were content coded ( = 0.77), aggregated by topical categories, and descriptively summarized. Participants were mostly white and non-Hispanic ( = 43, 89.6%), cisgender female ( = 42, 87.5%), heterosexual ( = 35, 72.9%), and religious ( = 33, 68.8%); they averaged 49 years of age (range 26-72, SD = 11.66). Awareness of LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers depended on patient or caregiver self-disclosure and contextual cues; orientation and gender identity data were not routinely collected. Many viewed being LGBTQ+ as private, irrelevant to care, and not a basis for people having specific or unique EOL needs because they saw EOL processes as universal, and believed that they treat everyone equally. Providers were more comfortable with patients of lesbian or gay orientation and reported less comfort and limited experience caring for transgender and gender-diverse patients or caregivers. Many HCT members were unaware of specific issues impacting the EOL experiences of LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers, or how these experiences may inform important care and communication needs at EOL.