Design-manufacturing practice in the US and Sweden

• Published in: IEEE transactions on engineering management Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 74 - 81
• Main Authors: Ettlie, J.E., Trygg, L.D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY IEEE 01.02.1995; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Comparative studies; Convergence; Correlation analysis; Design for manufacture; Engineering education; Exact sciences and technology; Industrial economics; Inventory control, production control. Distribution; Job design; Management styles; Manufacturing; Manufacturing industries; Manufacturing processes; Multiskilling; Operational research and scientific management; Operational research. Management science; Product development; Statistical analysis; Technological planning; Technology management; Sweden; United States; North America; Europe; America; United States > US; Design; Manufacturing; Comparative study; Firm
• ISSN: 0018-9391; 1558-0040
• DOI: 10.1109/17.366407

In a comparative study of 208 US and 109 Swedish durable goods firms, and their practices for promoting design-manufacturing integration, greatest convergence was found for the adoption of manufacturing sign-off of product plans. Sign-off was also the most widespread practice, currently being used by about 75% of all companies in both countries. The US and Swedish firms were also similar, but not identical, in their promotion of mobility among engineers across functions. Permanent moves occur in about half these firms in both countries, but the details, such as which positions are involved, were not available. New structures to promote design-manufacturing integration mere adopted by about 60-65% of all Swedish firms and the larger US companies (1991), but 46% for small US firms (1993). Both countries report the widespread use of teams. There appears to be considerable difference between the two countries in adoption of design training. In 1992 the Swedish adoption rate of DFM (Design for Manufacturing) training was about 20% which is nearly the same as the US large firm adoption rate of 18% in 1987. The larger firm US adoption rate was nearly 56% in 1991 (41% for smaller firms in 1993) but institutional factors such as engineering education have not been controlled. The widest divergence between Swedish and US policies and practices for design-manufacturing integration concerns job rotation. Correlation results indicate convergence of adoption practices in the area of DFM training and manufacturing sign-off for Sweden and the US.< >