Parasitological contamination of arable soil in selected regions of Poland - preliminary study

• Published in: Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 661 - 668
• Main Authors: Zdybel, Jolanta Małgorzata, Karamon, Jacek, Sroka, Jacek, Wójcik-Fatla, Angelina, Skowron, Piotr, Kowalczyk, Katarzyna, Jadczyszyn, Jan, Cencek, Tomasz
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Poland 22.12.2023
• Subjects: Agriculture; Animals; Cattle; Parasite Egg Count; Poland; Soil - parasitology; Swine; Toxocara; Poland; parasite eggs; soil analysis; Ascaris spp; Toxocara spp
• ISSN: 1232-1966; 1898-2263
• DOI: 10.26444/aaem/176816

The hygienic status of arable soils in most developed countries has been unknown. In the presented study, a preliminary investigation was undertaken to determine the contamination with eggs of parasitic nematodes in the soil of arable fields in Poland. The aim of the study was to determine whether such contamination is common enough to constitute a significant problem and what factors may influence it. The study was conducted in 5 Polish provinces from autumn 2021 to spring 2022. The provinces differed significantly in terms of the area of agricultural land, agricultural suitability, type of soil, scale of cattle and pig breeding, production of manure and slurry, and the use of manures and organic fertilizers for fertilization. A total of 133 soil samples were collected. Parasitological examination of soil samples was carried out using the PN-Z-19006 method [1], with confirmed high sensitivity. Parasite eggs were found in a total of 67 samples, of which 56 samples contained eggs of roundworms of the genus (an average of 3.29 eggs/100 g of soil), 23 contained eggs of whipworms (an average of 1.22 eggs/100 g), and 3 contained eggs of Toxocara (1 egg/100 g). Differences in the percentage of positive samples were found depending on the period in which the samples were taken. The percentage of positive samples collected in autumn (53.57%) was higher than the percentage of positive samples collected in spring (48.05%). Similarly, the average number of eggs of in positive samples collected in autumn (3.43 eggs/100 g) was higher than the average number of eggs in samples collected in spring (2.90 eggs/100 g). Differences in the percentage of positive samples were also found depending on the region of origin of the samples.